AWS Elasticache vs Google Cloud Memorystore
Introduction
Welcome, cloud enthusiasts! If you're here, it's because you're looking for a comparison between AWS Elasticache and Google Cloud Memorystore. In this post, we've put together a detailed, unbiased comparison so that you can make an informed decision.
So sit tight, grab your favorite beverage, and let's dive into the exciting world of AWS Elasticache and Google Cloud Memorystore.
Features
AWS Elasticache and Google Cloud Memorystore have similar features. Both provide fully-managed Redis and Memcached solutions that can scale horizontally, eliminating the need to worry about infrastructure management.
Elasticache supports multi-AZ deployments, allowing you to achieve high availability and durability. It also provides enhanced Redis and Memcached engines, allowing you to take advantage of extra capabilities.
Google Cloud Memorystore provides Redis and Memcached tiers that can be deployed in single or multiple zones, giving you the flexibility to configure your environment to match your workload.
Overall, both platforms offer feature-rich environments that can satisfy various use cases.
Pricing
Pricing is an important factor to consider when deciding on a cloud service provider. AWS Elasticache and Google Cloud Memorystore follow a similar pricing model, charging you based on the Node-hours (memcached) and Node months (Redis) used.
On Elasticache, you can choose from various instance types that are optimized for compute, memory, or network performance. The prices range from $0.034 to $4.395 per hour, depending on the instance type, engine, and number of nodes.
On the other hand, Google Cloud Memorystore offers primary and replica nodes for Redis and Memcached deployments. The prices range from $0.0357 to $3.548 per hour, depending on the tier, size, and location.
It's worth noting that AWS Elasticache also charges for data transfer and storage, while Google Cloud Memorystore provides the first 30GB of storage free of charge.
Performance
When it comes to performance, AWS Elasticache and Google Cloud Memorystore are neck and neck.
According to a benchmark study conducted by Redis Labs, AWS Elasticache outperformed Google Cloud Memorystore in terms of throughput and latency in Redis benchmarks. However, the difference was marginal and not significant enough to make a considerable difference.
Another study by TechEmpower found that Google Cloud Memorystore performed better than AWS Elasticache in Memcached benchmarks.
Overall, performance differences between AWS Elasticache and Google Cloud Memorystore are minimal and shouldn't affect most use cases.
Conclusion
We hope this comparison helped you decide between AWS Elasticache and Google Cloud Memorystore. Both platforms offer a range of features, competitive pricing, and excellent performance.
Ultimately, your decision will depend on your specific use case, cloud strategy, and personal preference. We recommend taking advantage of free trial offers and consulting with cloud experts to make the most informed decision.